2 Responses

  1. Loren Coleman
    Loren Coleman January 7, 2006 at 11:26 am |

    How is a statement such as “this drawing is not valuable even as a sociological artifact,” even defendable?

    To not give credit to the importance of art, native sculptures, encounter sketches, folkloric imagery, and eyewitness drawings is to exclude – sociologically, zoologically, and psychologically – major pieces of the puzzle.

    Only an open mind will allow all the various elements of evidence in, some of which may become critical later in solving the mystery.

  2. Loren Coleman
    Loren Coleman January 9, 2006 at 7:42 am |

    Please make comments that add intellectually to the cryptozoological debate. Flames and personalized arguments will be deleted.

Comments are closed.