One day in June of 1873, a farmer in Bonham, Texas, USA, looked up from his work and was astonished at what he saw. There appeared to be an enormous flying snake, banded with brilliant yellow stripes, writhing and twisting in the sky above him. Other people in the Bonham vicinity also witnessed this strange apparition, which was said to be at least as long as a telegraph pole. According to a report in the local newspaper, Enterprise, the bewildered eyewitnesses watched the creature coil itself up, and thrust forward its enormous head as if striking at something.
In my 1985 book Curious Encounters, I wrote of a similiar “Sky Serpent” seen not long afterwards above Fort Scott, Kansas, by members of the U.S. Cavalry stationed there. A hissing serpent in the sky was seen in 1888 over South Carolina, a shining snake wriggled vertically through the skies of Scandinavia in March, 1935, and two separate sightings told of sky snakes over Cruz Alta, Brazil, in December, 1935, and then again in July, 1937.
What are all of these “Sky Serpents”?
Jerome Clark, in a new article in the July 2009 issue of Fortean Times, examines the issue of Sky Serpents in some depth.
See Clark’s great treatment on this interesting phenomenon, online, here.
In an exclusive to Cryptomundo, Jerry Clark responses to those who say that the historical, global sightings of “Sky Serpents” are merely due to “serpent kites”:
The kites look nothing like what are described in the various sky-serpent reports.
If you’re looking for prosaic explanations for at least some sightings, more promising avenues of inquiry are auroral phenomena (e.g., the Texas serpent that circled the sun), meteoritic trails (for the very rare nocturnal cases), and (most productively) good old-fashioned hoaxes.
As for the rest: well, they’re as likely to have been caused by kites or meteors as Sasquatch reports are by guys in gorilla suits. It all depends upon how much you want or need a conventional solution and to what lengths you’ll go to conjure one up.
Me, I suspect that neither reductionist explanations nor literal interpretations — flying snakes in the zoological sense — will do. The simple fact of the matter is that people have strange experiences of all kinds. As long as you don’t confuse experiences with events and you can live with paradox and ambiguity, you need not lose sleep trying to make up propositions, prosaic or extraordinary, for which you can’t provide evidence.
Jerry Clark
Follow CryptoZooNews
Not Found
The resource could not be found.