<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sci-Fi’s Mothman Non-Investigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/</link>
	<description>Posts by Loren Coleman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/rich-dolan/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please see Rich Dolan&#039;s comments on this program by clicking here.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/rich-dolan/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><em>Please see Rich Dolan&#8217;s comments on this program by clicking here.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goerman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6909</link>
		<dc:creator>goerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;For example, Mothman researcher and skeptic Robert Goerman has reinforced the non-glowing argument in his 2002 Anomalist essay, &quot;Mothman’s Eyes.&quot; Goerman did what anyone looking into Mothman should do: he did what I did, he read the original reports....&quot;

Hi Loren and all -

Hope this finds you and yours well.

For those of you who are interested, I also wrote an online Mothman article for the Animal X television show
Series 03, Episode 5 - Winged Creatures

Click on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.animalx.net/winged_creatures.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MOTHMAN: Witness Lament&lt;/a&gt;.
My article will open in a new box.

I agree with Loren on so many points...

But one!

I DO NOT CONSIDER MYSELF A &quot;SKEPTIC.&quot;

My work speaks for itself.

Loren and I sometimes &quot;disagree&quot; on the value of precious time and resources when it comes to investigative research and reporting of the unknown and unexplained. But I want what most of us here want: QUALITY EVIDENCE and HONEST, PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATION.

I also agree with many of the points made by my colleague, Rich Dolan. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/rich-dolan/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please see Rich Dolan&#039;s comments by clicking here.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]

This TV show reminds me of the book, THREE MEN SEEKING MONSTERS.

This premise has promise!

THREE MEN (and a lady) SEEKING MONSTERS.

They only fail when they quit trying.

My fingers are crossed.

Good luck, Rich!

Yours in research,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://profiles.yahoo.com/robert_a_goerman&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Robert A. Goerman&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For example, Mothman researcher and skeptic Robert Goerman has reinforced the non-glowing argument in his 2002 Anomalist essay, &#8220;Mothman’s Eyes.&#8221; Goerman did what anyone looking into Mothman should do: he did what I did, he read the original reports&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi Loren and all -</p>
<p>Hope this finds you and yours well.</p>
<p>For those of you who are interested, I also wrote an online Mothman article for the Animal X television show<br />
Series 03, Episode 5 &#8211; Winged Creatures</p>
<p>Click on <a href="http://www.animalx.net/winged_creatures.html" rel="nofollow">MOTHMAN: Witness Lament</a>.<br />
My article will open in a new box.</p>
<p>I agree with Loren on so many points&#8230;</p>
<p>But one!</p>
<p>I DO NOT CONSIDER MYSELF A &#8220;SKEPTIC.&#8221;</p>
<p>My work speaks for itself.</p>
<p>Loren and I sometimes &#8220;disagree&#8221; on the value of precious time and resources when it comes to investigative research and reporting of the unknown and unexplained. But I want what most of us here want: QUALITY EVIDENCE and HONEST, PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATION.</p>
<p>I also agree with many of the points made by my colleague, Rich Dolan. [<a href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/rich-dolan/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><em>Please see Rich Dolan&#8217;s comments by clicking here.</em></a>]</p>
<p>This TV show reminds me of the book, THREE MEN SEEKING MONSTERS.</p>
<p>This premise has promise!</p>
<p>THREE MEN (and a lady) SEEKING MONSTERS.</p>
<p>They only fail when they quit trying.</p>
<p>My fingers are crossed.</p>
<p>Good luck, Rich!</p>
<p>Yours in research,<br />
<a href="http://profiles.yahoo.com/robert_a_goerman" rel="nofollow">Robert A. Goerman</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joppa</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6908</link>
		<dc:creator>joppa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always wondered if the Mothman sightings were ever related to the Marshall football team plane crash in the early 70&#039;s. Any connection?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered if the Mothman sightings were ever related to the Marshall football team plane crash in the early 70&#8242;s. Any connection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: investigator45</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6905</link>
		<dc:creator>investigator45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago, after watching the mothman movie, I took a detour during my travels and visited point pleasant. There isnt much to say about a sad depresed appalachian town.

 After reading about the scifi channel version, if I were the mothman, I would be upset too..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, after watching the mothman movie, I took a detour during my travels and visited point pleasant. There isnt much to say about a sad depresed appalachian town.</p>
<p> After reading about the scifi channel version, if I were the mothman, I would be upset too..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6899</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loren, your assessment is right on. This show sucks. Of course, I&#039;m dumb enough to watch it!

Does the girl, Debbie Dybrydny (sp) look familiar to anyone else? I&#039;ve got this weird feeling she&#039;s just an actress, that I&#039;ve seen her before. And the archeologist seems to be a Tommy Chong wanna be. Are any of their credentials listed anywhere? Does anyone know? I&#039;m thinking actors here, which would, of course, make this show an even larger farce than it already is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren, your assessment is right on. This show sucks. Of course, I&#8217;m dumb enough to watch it!</p>
<p>Does the girl, Debbie Dybrydny (sp) look familiar to anyone else? I&#8217;ve got this weird feeling she&#8217;s just an actress, that I&#8217;ve seen her before. And the archeologist seems to be a Tommy Chong wanna be. Are any of their credentials listed anywhere? Does anyone know? I&#8217;m thinking actors here, which would, of course, make this show an even larger farce than it already is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gridbug</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>gridbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I channelled one-time psychic extraordinairre Criswell to verify the veracity of last night&#039;s Mothman Investigation episode and was told in no uncertain terms that it was complete and utter garbage, should be avoided at all costs, and that in fact it could (and should) very well be the nail in the coffin of SciFi&#039;s latest and worst attempt at competent paranormal investigation. Hence, I skipped the episode altogether and killed time playing &#039;God Of War&#039; on PS2 whilst waiting for LOST.

Thanks a million, Crizz! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I channelled one-time psychic extraordinairre Criswell to verify the veracity of last night&#8217;s Mothman Investigation episode and was told in no uncertain terms that it was complete and utter garbage, should be avoided at all costs, and that in fact it could (and should) very well be the nail in the coffin of SciFi&#8217;s latest and worst attempt at competent paranormal investigation. Hence, I skipped the episode altogether and killed time playing &#8216;God Of War&#8217; on PS2 whilst waiting for LOST.</p>
<p>Thanks a million, Crizz! <img src='http://www.cryptozoonews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dharkheart</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6895</link>
		<dc:creator>dharkheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a member of an investigative team says he is too &quot;interviewed out&quot; to see anymore witnesses I think it&#039;s time for a new team member.

He thought the hotel where they were staying was creepy and spooky; I&#039;m paraphrasing, I know but how does someone like that investigate hauntings, etc?

That was the first time I had watched the show. I was fairly impressed with the female team member (I don&#039;t know their names). I am fairly certain I won&#039;t be watching the show again if that&#039;s the way things will be addressed in future.

There was another show I have seen in the past: a woman traveling in a large motorhome. I don&#039;t recall the name of that show, either but at least the team members showed enthusiasm when doing an investigation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a member of an investigative team says he is too &#8220;interviewed out&#8221; to see anymore witnesses I think it&#8217;s time for a new team member.</p>
<p>He thought the hotel where they were staying was creepy and spooky; I&#8217;m paraphrasing, I know but how does someone like that investigate hauntings, etc?</p>
<p>That was the first time I had watched the show. I was fairly impressed with the female team member (I don&#8217;t know their names). I am fairly certain I won&#8217;t be watching the show again if that&#8217;s the way things will be addressed in future.</p>
<p>There was another show I have seen in the past: a woman traveling in a large motorhome. I don&#8217;t recall the name of that show, either but at least the team members showed enthusiasm when doing an investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dre222</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/sci-fis-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-6885</link>
		<dc:creator>dre222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/sci-fis-mothman-non-investigation/#comment-6885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also watched the episode last night and couldn&#039;t believe how badly the facts were distorted - especialy about Point Pleasant&#039;s economy. I attended college about 45 minutes from Point Pleasant during &#039;98-&#039;02 and we would frequently go there to purchase alcohol and biscuits.

We never saw the Mothman statue, and didn&#039;t see the Mothman museum until a few months after the movie opened. I believe the museum used to be a clothing store or something similar before the movie. When Rob claimed that the town had perpetuated the stories all this time to help support their economy, I was speechless. I had never heard of the Mothman or anything strange about Point Pleasant until after the movie came out and I was there about every other month for 2 years. I was happy to see that the residents were cashing in on the tourism the movie generated. The town was (and still is) economically depressed like much of that area of Appalachia. Like said above, the town did not make the huge profits from the film.

The tourism and time may be affecting witnesses&#039; stories, but the SciFi show was just trying to make everyone look like backwards rural idiots anyway. My favorite part was when they tried to find the Mothman in the woods. Apparently they didn&#039;t catch the part of their own commentary that specifically said, &quot;After the bridge collapsed, the sightings stopped.&quot; How were they going to track something that hasn&#039;t been sighted in the area for 40 years? It would be interesting to see how many minutes of the show were actually devoted to just showing the flying Mothman prop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also watched the episode last night and couldn&#8217;t believe how badly the facts were distorted &#8211; especialy about Point Pleasant&#8217;s economy. I attended college about 45 minutes from Point Pleasant during &#8217;98-&#8217;02 and we would frequently go there to purchase alcohol and biscuits.</p>
<p>We never saw the Mothman statue, and didn&#8217;t see the Mothman museum until a few months after the movie opened. I believe the museum used to be a clothing store or something similar before the movie. When Rob claimed that the town had perpetuated the stories all this time to help support their economy, I was speechless. I had never heard of the Mothman or anything strange about Point Pleasant until after the movie came out and I was there about every other month for 2 years. I was happy to see that the residents were cashing in on the tourism the movie generated. The town was (and still is) economically depressed like much of that area of Appalachia. Like said above, the town did not make the huge profits from the film.</p>
<p>The tourism and time may be affecting witnesses&#8217; stories, but the SciFi show was just trying to make everyone look like backwards rural idiots anyway. My favorite part was when they tried to find the Mothman in the woods. Apparently they didn&#8217;t catch the part of their own commentary that specifically said, &#8220;After the bridge collapsed, the sightings stopped.&#8221; How were they going to track something that hasn&#8217;t been sighted in the area for 40 years? It would be interesting to see how many minutes of the show were actually devoted to just showing the flying Mothman prop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
