Comments on: NatGeo Will Broadcast Sykes’ Yeti & Zana DNA Findings

By: YorkshireRichW

YorkshireRichW — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:22:36 +0000

2 hours is probably a good length for the whole series. Individually they did have that annoying habit of telling you what was coming up before and then repeating all the key information post each break.
Sykes comes across as wanting to debunk the myths but with a focus on hard evidence, whatever that might show up, ancient polar bears and all.
I think what Mark Evans is looking for is “Bigfoot”, what he finds are human stories whether it is the real ancestry of Zana and her captivity or the impact of the results of DNA assessments on the individuals who believe something different. These tell us more about ourselves than any other wild creature out there.

By: chadgatlin

chadgatlin — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:56:16 +0000

For everyone’s reference when setting your DVR, the title (at least in my Dish Network guide) is listed as “Bigfoot: The New Evidence”.

By: DWA

DWA — Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:08:53 +0000

It is kind of odd that with all the “unknown” results that have been disappeared (yes, an active verb there), suddenly Sykes and Ketchum are going to prove something with the same finding.

By: mandors

mandors — Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:56:15 +0000

Way back in the 90s, PBS’ “Nova” did a show on China’s “Wildman.” There were hair samples DNA tested, and some were reported as know animals but others came back “primate: other.” Don’t know what ever happened to them or the data.