<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malaysia Reads Your Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptozoonews.com/malaywatch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/malaywatch/</link>
	<description>Posts by Loren Coleman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/malaywatch/comment-page-1/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 10:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/malaysia-watching-cryptomundo-comments/#comment-2375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Different folks assume and presume to know what my preface will say.  There is a new skeptics book out, debunking Lake Monsters.  I wrote the preface.  Will my reputation be destroyed because I call for an open-minded and a balanced inquiry in cryptozoology in that book?  I have written a contribution to the new cryptozoology and art book for the Bates Museum of Art&#039;s exhibition on cryptozoology, in which I look at the history of cryptozoology in a Fortean and zoological context.  Will my reputation be ruined by that?  Oh dear friends, rush not to judgement about mere words on a page not written.  I will be reasonable and reasoned, no matter the spurious speculations here, my mutual mates in this madness.

See today&#039;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/impczhumor/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pondering the Mawas Situation&lt;/a&gt;&quot; for more about this.

:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different folks assume and presume to know what my preface will say.  There is a new skeptics book out, debunking Lake Monsters.  I wrote the preface.  Will my reputation be destroyed because I call for an open-minded and a balanced inquiry in cryptozoology in that book?  I have written a contribution to the new cryptozoology and art book for the Bates Museum of Art&#8217;s exhibition on cryptozoology, in which I look at the history of cryptozoology in a Fortean and zoological context.  Will my reputation be ruined by that?  Oh dear friends, rush not to judgement about mere words on a page not written.  I will be reasonable and reasoned, no matter the spurious speculations here, my mutual mates in this madness.</p>
<p>See today&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/impczhumor/" rel="nofollow">Pondering the Mawas Situation</a>&#8221; for more about this.<br />
 <img src='http://www.cryptozoonews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
