<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leprechauns, Hobbits and Other Little People In Maine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/</link>
	<description>Posts by Loren Coleman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troodon56</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/comment-page-1/#comment-57960</link>
		<dc:creator>Troodon56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=64970#comment-57960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, Loren! Thanks for the advice - I will try to get my hands on your book as soon as possible. But I just don&#039;t understand what the difference between a Sasquatch/Yeti and a Bigfoot/Abominable Snowman is, morphologically-speaking. From all of what I&#039;ve read, they&#039;re pretty much the same thing. If you know any differences, Loren, I would love it if you could enlighten me a little bit! Thanks! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Loren! Thanks for the advice &#8211; I will try to get my hands on your book as soon as possible. But I just don&#8217;t understand what the difference between a Sasquatch/Yeti and a Bigfoot/Abominable Snowman is, morphologically-speaking. From all of what I&#8217;ve read, they&#8217;re pretty much the same thing. If you know any differences, Loren, I would love it if you could enlighten me a little bit! Thanks! <img src='http://www.cryptozoonews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/comment-page-1/#comment-57957</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=64970#comment-57957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Troodon56, for your opinion. However, I feel that while your basic thesis is partially correction, you seem to have missed out on the majority thoughts within the field that does separate out the Orang Pendek from the Yeti and from the Sasquatch.

Yes, many of us sense the Orang Pendek is an evolved form of &lt;em&gt;Homo floresiensis&lt;/em&gt;. Additionally, the fossil candidate for Yeti probably is a form of &lt;em&gt;Dryopithecus&lt;/em&gt;, maybe &lt;em&gt;Gigantopithecus&lt;/em&gt;. Sasquatch/Bigfoot are probably &lt;em&gt;Paranthropus&lt;/em&gt;. There are some in the Bigfoot camp that think Sasquatch are &lt;em&gt;Gigantopithecus&lt;/em&gt;, however. Time will tell with the discovery of these species.

In my book, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933665122/ref=ase_cryptozoologi-20/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Field Guide to Bigfoot and Other Mystery Primates&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (NY: Anomalist Books, 1999, rev. ed. 2006, with Patrick Huyghe), the entire notion of separate species and genus worldwide is explored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Troodon56, for your opinion. However, I feel that while your basic thesis is partially correction, you seem to have missed out on the majority thoughts within the field that does separate out the Orang Pendek from the Yeti and from the Sasquatch.</p>
<p>Yes, many of us sense the Orang Pendek is an evolved form of <em>Homo floresiensis</em>. Additionally, the fossil candidate for Yeti probably is a form of <em>Dryopithecus</em>, maybe <em>Gigantopithecus</em>. Sasquatch/Bigfoot are probably <em>Paranthropus</em>. There are some in the Bigfoot camp that think Sasquatch are <em>Gigantopithecus</em>, however. Time will tell with the discovery of these species.</p>
<p>In my book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933665122/ref=ase_cryptozoologi-20/" rel="nofollow">The Field Guide to Bigfoot and Other Mystery Primates</a></em> (NY: Anomalist Books, 1999, rev. ed. 2006, with Patrick Huyghe), the entire notion of separate species and genus worldwide is explored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troodon56</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/comment-page-1/#comment-57956</link>
		<dc:creator>Troodon56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=64970#comment-57956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on this research, I am convinced that the Orang Pendek is probably a surviving modern-day representative (or a descendant) of the Hobbit, &lt;em&gt;Homo floresiensis&lt;/em&gt;. 

But with the Yeti and the Sasquatch, in my opinion, the situation is a little bit different. You see, these 2 cryptids are so similar to each other that, in my opinion, they must be members of the same species (or at least the same genus). 
And they also happen to be so unlike any primates from the fossil record, that I just can&#039;t identify a good candidate for either one of them. Therefore, it is my hypothesis that the Yeti and the Sasquatch are creatures which are completely new to science. So new, in fact, that the fossils of their ancestors probably haven&#039;t even been discovered yet.

This proves a very important point; when you&#039;re dealing with hominology, you cannot just lump them all together, and then proclaim that your own pet hypothesis must explain them all. That&#039;s just not how it works at all. 
Indeed, I shall once again repeat that, in my opinion, the Orang-Pendek is not closely related to the Yeti and Sasquatch at all, and that it is most-likely descended from its own, and very uniquely-evolved, ancient lineage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on this research, I am convinced that the Orang Pendek is probably a surviving modern-day representative (or a descendant) of the Hobbit, <em>Homo floresiensis</em>. </p>
<p>But with the Yeti and the Sasquatch, in my opinion, the situation is a little bit different. You see, these 2 cryptids are so similar to each other that, in my opinion, they must be members of the same species (or at least the same genus).<br />
And they also happen to be so unlike any primates from the fossil record, that I just can&#8217;t identify a good candidate for either one of them. Therefore, it is my hypothesis that the Yeti and the Sasquatch are creatures which are completely new to science. So new, in fact, that the fossils of their ancestors probably haven&#8217;t even been discovered yet.</p>
<p>This proves a very important point; when you&#8217;re dealing with hominology, you cannot just lump them all together, and then proclaim that your own pet hypothesis must explain them all. That&#8217;s just not how it works at all.<br />
Indeed, I shall once again repeat that, in my opinion, the Orang-Pendek is not closely related to the Yeti and Sasquatch at all, and that it is most-likely descended from its own, and very uniquely-evolved, ancient lineage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex hearn</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/comment-page-1/#comment-57955</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex hearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=64970#comment-57955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably very low with such a small brain cavity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably very low with such a small brain cavity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poeticsofbigfoot</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/comment-page-1/#comment-57951</link>
		<dc:creator>poeticsofbigfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=64970#comment-57951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how their intelligence compared with other, extant primates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how their intelligence compared with other, extant primates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandors</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/hf-me/comment-page-1/#comment-57950</link>
		<dc:creator>mandors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=64970#comment-57950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting how there is an actual correlation in the fossil record to &quot;little people&quot; (as well as giants). But I&#039;m not sure I understand why Homo Erectus has Gene Simmons&#039; hair? 

Or wait... maybe I do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how there is an actual correlation in the fossil record to &#8220;little people&#8221; (as well as giants). But I&#8217;m not sure I understand why Homo Erectus has Gene Simmons&#8217; hair? </p>
<p>Or wait&#8230; maybe I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
