<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Changed the Face of Bigfoot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/</link>
	<description>Posts by Loren Coleman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 21:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57983</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are two interesting reports in their description of the subject, particularly the face.

http://bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=39268
http://woodape.org/reports/report/detail/429

Several things worth noting here:

1) We have an inherent bias in these matters.  Anything that looks remotely human is going to register big time and shift the naive observer&#039;s take toward &quot;human.&quot;  Shoot, Bobbie Short has them down as human based on the footprints.

2) When I first saw a close-up of an orangutan&#039;s face, as a small child, my reaction was:  THAT&#039;S A PERSON!

3) When National Geographic put the A. afarensis baby on its cover with the headline &quot;First Child&quot;, I thought:  that&#039;s an orangutan.

4) Artists only have the witness&#039;s description to go on.  That leaves a lot of room for error.

The face doesn&#039;t make it any more human than bipedalism (birds) and footprints do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are two interesting reports in their description of the subject, particularly the face.</p>
<p><a href="http://bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=39268" rel="nofollow">http://bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=39268</a><br />
<a href="http://woodape.org/reports/report/detail/429" rel="nofollow">http://woodape.org/reports/report/detail/429</a></p>
<p>Several things worth noting here:</p>
<p>1) We have an inherent bias in these matters.  Anything that looks remotely human is going to register big time and shift the naive observer&#8217;s take toward &#8220;human.&#8221;  Shoot, Bobbie Short has them down as human based on the footprints.</p>
<p>2) When I first saw a close-up of an orangutan&#8217;s face, as a small child, my reaction was:  THAT&#8217;S A PERSON!</p>
<p>3) When National Geographic put the A. afarensis baby on its cover with the headline &#8220;First Child&#8221;, I thought:  that&#8217;s an orangutan.</p>
<p>4) Artists only have the witness&#8217;s description to go on.  That leaves a lot of room for error.</p>
<p>The face doesn&#8217;t make it any more human than bipedalism (birds) and footprints do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57974</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[poeticsofbigfoot:  oh, I&#039;d like to know what Loren thinks too, but for my money, if you are gonna make a suit, make one that looks like your drawing.  That would have been easy.  But Patterson demonstrably didn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poeticsofbigfoot:  oh, I&#8217;d like to know what Loren thinks too, but for my money, if you are gonna make a suit, make one that looks like your drawing.  That would have been easy.  But Patterson demonstrably didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poeticsofbigfoot</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57972</link>
		<dc:creator>poeticsofbigfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elvis? You&#039;re kidding, right? I&#039;d like to know what Loren thinks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elvis? You&#8217;re kidding, right? I&#8217;d like to know what Loren thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanborky</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57971</link>
		<dc:creator>alanborky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loren looking at Patty again it finally dawned on me who she reminded me of.

Biffa Bacon in The Viz

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/cartoon/2009/nov/07/1

And Bully Beef out The Dandy

http://bigrab.wordpress.com/tag/bully-beef-and-chips/

And if Biffa and Bully&#039;s mums don&#039;t clue you in Patty&#039;s relatives still dwell in Britain how&#039;s about this for living proof Patty actually hails from Liverpool!

http://www.toontastic.net/board/topic/24167-i-didnt-know-that-biffa-bacons-mother-supported-liverpool/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren looking at Patty again it finally dawned on me who she reminded me of.</p>
<p>Biffa Bacon in The Viz</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/cartoon/2009/nov/07/1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/cartoon/2009/nov/07/1</a></p>
<p>And Bully Beef out The Dandy</p>
<p><a href="http://bigrab.wordpress.com/tag/bully-beef-and-chips/" rel="nofollow">http://bigrab.wordpress.com/tag/bully-beef-and-chips/</a></p>
<p>And if Biffa and Bully&#8217;s mums don&#8217;t clue you in Patty&#8217;s relatives still dwell in Britain how&#8217;s about this for living proof Patty actually hails from Liverpool!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.toontastic.net/board/topic/24167-i-didnt-know-that-biffa-bacons-mother-supported-liverpool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.toontastic.net/board/topic/24167-i-didnt-know-that-biffa-bacons-mother-supported-liverpool/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57970</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should have noted:

Look at Robert Bateman&#039;s (prominent wildlife artist, from Canada) painting of a sasquatch.  

http://proxy.baremetal.com/artcountrycanada.com/images/bateman-sasquatch-cropped.jpg

Looks like he got his nose take from Bindernagel, another Canadian, and their Jeff Meldrum, really, so no surprise there.

What the heck.  Here&#039;s Bateman&#039;s yeti:

http://www.sasquatchresearch.net/images/yetibateman.jpg

Another gorillanose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have noted:</p>
<p>Look at Robert Bateman&#8217;s (prominent wildlife artist, from Canada) painting of a sasquatch.  </p>
<p><a href="http://proxy.baremetal.com/artcountrycanada.com/images/bateman-sasquatch-cropped.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://proxy.baremetal.com/artcountrycanada.com/images/bateman-sasquatch-cropped.jpg</a></p>
<p>Looks like he got his nose take from Bindernagel, another Canadian, and their Jeff Meldrum, really, so no surprise there.</p>
<p>What the heck.  Here&#8217;s Bateman&#8217;s yeti:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sasquatchresearch.net/images/yetibateman.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.sasquatchresearch.net/images/yetibateman.jpg</a></p>
<p>Another gorillanose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWA</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57969</link>
		<dc:creator>DWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mandors:  That is interesting about the dichotomy on what&#039;s-the-nose-like.  I remember telling John Bindernagel at the 2009 Texas Bigfoot Conference about the hooded nose being a prominent feature of many reports; he expressed surprise.  I&#039;d bet personally based on my read that when I see one, it won&#039;t have a nose like a gorilla.

PoeticsOfBigfoot:  Not sure how &quot;remarkable&quot; the Patterson drawing is.  To me it looks much more like Elvis than it does like Patty.  I definitely would expect that drawing to come from before his seeing what one actually looked like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mandors:  That is interesting about the dichotomy on what&#8217;s-the-nose-like.  I remember telling John Bindernagel at the 2009 Texas Bigfoot Conference about the hooded nose being a prominent feature of many reports; he expressed surprise.  I&#8217;d bet personally based on my read that when I see one, it won&#8217;t have a nose like a gorilla.</p>
<p>PoeticsOfBigfoot:  Not sure how &#8220;remarkable&#8221; the Patterson drawing is.  To me it looks much more like Elvis than it does like Patty.  I definitely would expect that drawing to come from before his seeing what one actually looked like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poeticsofbigfoot</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57968</link>
		<dc:creator>poeticsofbigfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loren, can you clarify something for me? I&#039;ve never seen the sketch by Patterson- he drew it before the P-G film? If so, that&#039;s remarkable, don&#039;t you think? Excellent post, thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren, can you clarify something for me? I&#8217;ve never seen the sketch by Patterson- he drew it before the P-G film? If so, that&#8217;s remarkable, don&#8217;t you think? Excellent post, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mandors</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57967</link>
		<dc:creator>mandors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My limited understanding is that the variance in depiction may lie in the theoretical versus the actual.  The real difference as I see it is in the nose. Actual witnesses consistently report a &quot;hooded&quot; or more humanlike nose, while the theorists, e.g., the giganto crowd, show a more simian nose.  For my two cents, if Bigfoot exists, it is clearly bipedal a trait which predates modern great apes, and as such most likely would have evolved on a similar path as humans, making a hooded nose more likely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My limited understanding is that the variance in depiction may lie in the theoretical versus the actual.  The real difference as I see it is in the nose. Actual witnesses consistently report a &#8220;hooded&#8221; or more humanlike nose, while the theorists, e.g., the giganto crowd, show a more simian nose.  For my two cents, if Bigfoot exists, it is clearly bipedal a trait which predates modern great apes, and as such most likely would have evolved on a similar path as humans, making a hooded nose more likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57965</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, RPJ, exactly. But the source of WT&#039;s drawings were not reconstructions. They were not evolved cultural imagery. They were done from direct eyewitnesses being interviewed and under their direction. The P-G threshold is a branch in the road, not a waterfall event.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, RPJ, exactly. But the source of WT&#8217;s drawings were not reconstructions. They were not evolved cultural imagery. They were done from direct eyewitnesses being interviewed and under their direction. The P-G threshold is a branch in the road, not a waterfall event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Pill Junkie</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/comment-page-1/#comment-57964</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Pill Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptozoonews.com/?p=65073#comment-57964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And yet the Thompson&#039;s drawings are more recent than the P-G film.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet the Thompson&#8217;s drawings are more recent than the P-G film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
